This paper argues that we can only have a just appreciation of the rise and early development of philosophic dialogue in Greece by bracketing the immense influence that the Platonic version of the form has exerted and turning instead to tracing how “Socratic logoi” came to be recognized as a new prose genre in fourth-century Athens. A consideration of the early terms used to name the form suggests that dialogue should not be derived from fifth-century mime or drama but should be understood in the context of the burgeoning rhetorical literature of the period; in particular, dialogue will be shown to be one of many innovative kinds of fictional speech-texts that were proclaiming new and special powers for written prose.
Abstract: This essay considers recent monographs on the paean as a significant, if problematic example of the return of genre as a critical category in Greek lyric. I then consider why the peaen remains resistant to neat classification and finally suggest, through reading a series of early paeanic texts, that we can better understand the elusive form if we put aside the quest for a timeless, ideal pattern and notice instead certain religious and rhetorical dynamics that the paian-cry itself entails.
Abstract: This is an attempt to describe Herodotus’ relation to Greek poets, both as historical sources and as “cultural capital.” It is a brief discussion (1500 words) written for a general audience; but it may be of interest as raising a matter not often considered outside of the excellent and long study by Ph.-E. Legrand in Vol. 1 of the Budé Hérodote (pp. 147 ff.).